The Horror Asylum

Sign Up   Forgot Password? 
11,710 horror articles & features | 6,992 horror movies | 1,590 horror reviews | 1,683 giveaways hosted | 228 delicious interviews Established in 2001  
The Horror Asylum
  Horror News   Reviews   Giveaways   Interviews
Movies | TV | DVDs | Books | Games Movies | DVD | Books | Games Just Added | Ending Soon Just Added | Archives
Home About Enquiries Submissions Advertising Premium Feeds Cookies


Robin Hood Film Review Jeschke Reveals New Horror Short 'It Happened on Orchard Street' Maria The Wanted and the Legacy of The Keepers Unleashed The First Trailer for Occurrence at Mills Creek Unveiled
Top 5 Horror Games Betsy Lynn George Returns for Don Swanson's 'Occurrence at Mills Creek' REVIEW: Thomas Crane's HALLOWEEN PARTY CryptTV's Sunny Family Cult Season 3 Now Available

WIN Sci-Fi Thriller OCCUPATION on Blu-ray
WIN Sci-Fi Thriller OCCUPATION on Blu-ray
Hideo Nakata’s Classic RING Giveaway
Hideo Nakata’s Classic RING Giveaway
WIN a PIERCING Quad Poster
WIN a PIERCING Quad Poster

Exorcist: The Beginning
Buy from Buy from

Exorcist: The Beginning (2003)

movie | Movie Details
Images, Posters, News
| Comments
Have your say

Plot Summary:
"In this prequel to The Exorcist, Father Merrin is a younger man working on a dig in Africa. Suddenly, a young boy starts to become ill and starts to suffer from the same syndromes that Regan from the fist movie suffered. Before long, Pazuzu, the demon from the movies, fully possesses the boy and Father Merrin is the only one who can stop Pazuzu's evil plan of world domination."

Review by
Ryan McDonald
Follow me:
Review Date: 22 November 2004 My Rating: out of 5


Set in 1949, this is the story of Father Merrin (Stellan Skarsgaard), a disillusioned former priest now acting as an archaeologist (and full-time alcoholic) sent to Kenya to find an ancient artifact believed to be in a church that logically shouldn't even be there. He gets caught up in strange goings on amongst the voodoo practising locals, perhaps unleashing pure evil...and some seriously malicious butterflies. Various red herrings, children-devouring hyenas, inverted crosses, and our main character having Nazi flashbacks ensue.

Let's get a few things out of the way right now. 1) I'm not exactly a fan of 'The Exorcist'- generally well-made, disturbing and a good film overall, but slow and overrated. Personally, I prefer 'The Omen'. 2) This film has a dubious history, with original director Paul Schrader being fired after actually completing his film, a film the money-men didn't like. In his place came Renny Harlin, a very different director, but the idea of funding two versions of the same film seems like an unnecessary gamble to me.

It's a gamble that, whilst not really paying off in any way, I kinda sorta almost liked this film. And that's probably the kindest sentence you'll ever read about it, actually. But I thought it was OK for a B movie, and very different to the other films; kind of a cross between 'The Mummy Returns' and 'The Exorcist II', only not nearly as bad as the latter.

Skarsgaard is the perfect replacement for Max von Sydow and is not only believable and adds depth to this silly film, but he's the chief reason to almost kinda maybe see it. Visually the film looks gorgeous, especially the exterior shots, and Harlan approaches it with a sense of over-the-top fun to take away some of the burden of Skarsgaard's rather brooding character and the sometimes rather nasty subject. And yes, I actually LIKED the scene where CGI hyenas rip apart a child, it might've been silly and it sure was offensive, but hey, it's not every day you see a scene like that, is it?

I also found the story to be rather intriguing too, as was the main character. However there were problems. The flashbacks to Merrin's Nazi past were jarring and seemed tacked-on to me. Also Ben Cross' role is a pointless and annoying one, ditto that young priest who just seemed to be waiting around for someone to hand him a script.

However- and this is the main reason why I cannot exactly recommend the film- my main gripe is with the final third of the film. After a wonderfully atmospheric set-up, the film becomes a collection of stock-standard 'Exorcist' schtick with the silly voices and what not, and nearly ruins everything that came before it. Harlan and co get really, really lazy in this section of the film, and it's a shame. Oh, well, perhaps we'll see Schrader's version one day and maybe it'll be better.

Overall, this one isn't the stinker I'd feared or heard about, it's a pretty watchable B movie that makes one wish there was a 2 1/2 star rating here. Lower your expectations and ignore the dodgy butterfly attack. At least 75% of the film isn't just a retread of the previous films, just that last portion.

Blood and Guts: Comments


Not Registered?
Sign up for FREE >>

There are currently no comments.
Why not have your say!?

Don't fall behind, make sure you get help
writing college papers fast.


Get Out Movie Review

Get Out

Cellar Dweller Movie Review

Cellar Dweller

Pyewacket Movie Review


Quiet Place, A Movie Review

Quiet Place, A

Blair Witch Movie Review

Blair Witch

Dont Breathe Movie Review

Dont Breathe

All Through The House Movie Review

All Through The House

Ghoulies Movie Review


Night of Fear Movie Review

Night of Fear

Happy Death Day Movie Review

Happy Death Day

The Ritual Movie Review

The Ritual

Mercy Christmas Movie Review

Mercy Christmas

The Unraveling Movie Review

The Unraveling

The Witch Movie Review

The Witch

The Other Side of the Door Movie Review

The Other Side of the Door


WIN Sci-Fi Thriller OCCUPATION on Blu-ray Hideo Nakata’s Classic RING Giveaway
Now you can Watch your favorite Horror Movies using the Official ShowBox App


An Interview with Doug Hawley
Doug Hawley