The Horror Asylum

Sign Up   Forgot Password? 
11,710 horror articles & features | 6,992 horror movies | 1,590 horror reviews | 1,683 giveaways hosted | 228 delicious interviews Established in 2001  
The Horror Asylum
  Horror News   Reviews   Giveaways   Interviews
Movies | TV | DVDs | Books | Games Movies | DVD | Books | Games Just Added | Ending Soon Just Added | Archives
Home About Enquiries Submissions Advertising Premium Feeds Cookies


Robin Hood Film Review Jeschke Reveals New Horror Short 'It Happened on Orchard Street' Maria The Wanted and the Legacy of The Keepers Unleashed The First Trailer for Occurrence at Mills Creek Unveiled
Top 5 Horror Games Betsy Lynn George Returns for Don Swanson's 'Occurrence at Mills Creek' REVIEW: Thomas Crane's HALLOWEEN PARTY CryptTV's Sunny Family Cult Season 3 Now Available

WIN Sci-Fi Thriller OCCUPATION on Blu-ray
WIN Sci-Fi Thriller OCCUPATION on Blu-ray
Hideo Nakata’s Classic RING Giveaway
Hideo Nakata’s Classic RING Giveaway
WIN a PIERCING Quad Poster
WIN a PIERCING Quad Poster

Ginger Snaps Back
Buy from Buy from

Ginger Snaps Back (2004)

movie | Movie Details
Images, Posters, News
| Comments
Have your say

Plot Summary:
"Set in 19th Century Canada, Brigette and her sister Ginger take refuge in a Traders' Fort which later becomes under siege by some savage werewolves. And an enigmatic Indian hunter decides to help the girls, but one of the girls has been bitten by a werewolf. Brigitte and Ginger may have no one to turn to but themselves."

Review by
Ryan McDonald
Follow me:
Review Date: 27 February 2015 My Rating: out of 5


Set in snowy Canada in the 1800s, the film concerns sisters Ginger (Katharine Isabelle) and Brigitte (Emily Perkins) drifting through the wilderness. After encountering a weird old Indian woman who spouts dire warnings, Brigitte gets caught in a bear trap. Thankfully, an Indian hunter (Nathaniel Arcand) turns up to help, and leads them Fort Bailey, a trading post. But the men (Brendan Fletcher and surly J.R. Bourne among them) there are deeply fearful of outsiders, with only captain Tom McManus insisting they stay. Unfortunately, Fort Bailey seems to be targeted by werewolves…and Ginger gets bitten by one. And so it begins.

Although it was shot back-to-back with the second film, this 2004 prequel (alternate universe? Re-imagining?) from director Grant Harvey (second unit director on the first one- will the Best Boy direct the next one?) and writers Steve Mussicotte and Christina Ray seems to me to be an attempt to keep the series alive by creating an earlier or alternate timeline. The fact that I (and every other critic it seems) am unsure just what the film is, tells you all you need to know about the filmmakers’ motives here. It’s not a bad film in the slightest, but after two very strong entries, this one’s lacking in inspiration. It’s basically the first film with a different setting, and Katharine Isabelle’s Ginger completely neutered. That latter point is particularly regrettable. I get that the film is set during a time when women were probably more demure, but it makes it seem like Ginger isn’t herself here, and certainly isn’t as interesting. Ginger’s a bit bland to be honest. Yep, pretty proud of that one.

I also didn’t much care for the Indian mumbo-jumbo, including quite possibly the strangest film to find a peyote freak-out scene. It’s not nearly as fun as the one in “Young Guns”. These parts of the film are just a bit too clichéd and boring, with Nathaniel Arcand unable to act his way out of a paper hat, hardly helping. The other supporting characters, however, are nicely distinct from one another and pretty interesting. Fans of the TV show “Teen Wolf” will no doubt enjoy the presence of JR Bourne as perhaps the least likeable character in the film (I refuse to watch that show because it seems such a cheap ploy to turn the Michael J. Fox film into a “Twilight” with wolves teen TV drama that bears no resemblance to the film that inspired its title).

The film is also well-shot, though Michael Marshall has a pretty easy job with all that gorgeous, yet harsh snowy scenery (He later shot another snowbound film, “Wrong Turn 4: Bloody Beginnings”). It’s easily the best-looking film in the trilogy. The mixture of horror and period setting almost fooled me into thinking I was watching a Hammer film, though films like the underrated “Ravenous” and “Romasanta” are probably better comparisons. The werewolf scenes are pretty expertly staged, not showing too much of the presumably not terribly expensive FX, and relying more on sound FX and camera obfuscation. The music score by Alex Khaskin is also rather good, reminding me of “Game of Thrones” for some reason. So there’s certainly a lot to like here, it’s just a big stepdown from the two previous films, in terms of freshness and inspiration.

At the end of the day, this is a pretty watchable film, but it really is just a re-tread of the original with a different setting. That’s not quite enough to distinguish this one, if you ask me.

Reviewer: Phil Davies Brown @horrorasylum
Location:Scotland, UK
Review Date: 25 December 2004 My Rating: out of 5

The trilogy is finally complete and boy was it worth the wait! In this prequel, Katharine Isabelle and Emily Perkins return in the roles of Ginger and Bridgette, albeit in a different time and place.

Lost in the Canadian wilderness after an accident, the Fitzgerald sisters stumble upon a remote trading post where they find shelter, albeit begrudgingly, with the men who work there.

It soon transpires that the men have been under siege from a band of werewolves for some time now, and you better believe that when the sisters show up it only gets a whole lot worse for the residents.

This third film is absolutely beautiful, thanks to some wonderful cinematography and locations, and it is also very different to the previous two films whilst remaining true to the spirit and style of the earlier films.

The film in the tradition of the series is slowly paced, but it never drags and the cast are very good.

There are moments of gore and some slight morbid humour present, but despite managing to be fresh and it's own movie, the film seems to be lacking something that would have made it slightly better than the sequel.

There is no denying that this is a beautifully shot and competently made film, it is however a little more dramatic than the previous two films and I think this somewhat softens it's impact, as it was lacking the edge present in the previous films.

Fans of the series will not be disappointed as this third and hopefully final film (I would hate for them to ruin the series with pointless sequels) sees the trilogy come to a fitting end. The Ginger Snaps films are extremely well made movies that have provided fans with shocks, gore and most importantly a good story that will stand the test of time.

Blood and Guts: Comments


Not Registered?
Sign up for FREE >>

There are currently no comments.
Why not have your say!?

Don't fall behind, make sure you get help
writing college papers fast.


Get Out Movie Review

Get Out

Cellar Dweller Movie Review

Cellar Dweller

Pyewacket Movie Review


Quiet Place, A Movie Review

Quiet Place, A

Blair Witch Movie Review

Blair Witch

Dont Breathe Movie Review

Dont Breathe

All Through The House Movie Review

All Through The House

Ghoulies Movie Review


Night of Fear Movie Review

Night of Fear

Happy Death Day Movie Review

Happy Death Day

The Ritual Movie Review

The Ritual

Mercy Christmas Movie Review

Mercy Christmas

The Unraveling Movie Review

The Unraveling

The Witch Movie Review

The Witch

The Other Side of the Door Movie Review

The Other Side of the Door


WIN Sci-Fi Thriller OCCUPATION on Blu-ray Hideo Nakata’s Classic RING Giveaway
Now you can Watch your favorite Horror Movies using the Official ShowBox App


An Interview with Doug Hawley
Doug Hawley