The Horror Asylum

Sign Up   Forgot Password? 
11,710 horror articles & features | 6,992 horror movies | 1,590 horror reviews | 1,683 giveaways hosted | 228 delicious interviews Established in 2001  
The Horror Asylum
  Horror News   Reviews   Giveaways   Interviews
Movies | TV | DVDs | Books | Games Movies | DVD | Books | Games Just Added | Ending Soon Just Added | Archives
Home About Enquiries Submissions Advertising Premium Feeds Cookies


Robin Hood Film Review Jeschke Reveals New Horror Short 'It Happened on Orchard Street' Maria The Wanted and the Legacy of The Keepers Unleashed The First Trailer for Occurrence at Mills Creek Unveiled
Top 5 Horror Games Betsy Lynn George Returns for Don Swanson's 'Occurrence at Mills Creek' REVIEW: Thomas Crane's HALLOWEEN PARTY CryptTV's Sunny Family Cult Season 3 Now Available

WIN Sci-Fi Thriller OCCUPATION on Blu-ray
WIN Sci-Fi Thriller OCCUPATION on Blu-ray
Hideo Nakata’s Classic RING Giveaway
Hideo Nakata’s Classic RING Giveaway
WIN a PIERCING Quad Poster
WIN a PIERCING Quad Poster

The House of the Dead
Buy from Buy from

The House of the Dead (2003)

movie | Movie Details
Images, Posters, News
| Comments
Have your say

Plot Summary:
"This film is a prequel to all of the The House of the Dead video games. Set on an island off the coast of Florida, a techno rave party attracts a diverse group of college coeds and a Coast Guard officer. Soon, they discover that their X-laced escapades are to be interrupted by zombies and monsters that attack them on the ground, from the air, and in the sea, ruled by an evil entity in the House of the Dead."

Review by
Phil Davies Brown
Follow me:
Review Date: 03 November 2004 My Rating: out of 5


I finally saw this film despite everyones warnings, and I have to say that I knew exactly where they were coming from as this film was hilarious!!

The dialogue and the script were absolutely pitiful but even Uwe Boll has acknowledged this himself so I don't know why everyone blamed him...he didn't write the damn thing.

A group of (ahem) 'teens' I use the term loosely, head to a rave on an island, only to be confronted by hordes of zombies hungry for flesh.

The film was easy on the eye with lots of nice scenic shots and nice sets, but the aesthetics alone couldn't make this a good film as it was hampered by the most atrocious dialogue ever such as 'We broke up so that I could study and Alicia could fence. I didn't see what good it would do her' why didn't they just show us a brief scene of the character fencing instead of trying to say to us that there will be a sword fight later?

This film also had a good and capable cast who have been in far greater movies, which was a further sign of how awful the script was, and poor Ellie Cornell...she might have been the best character here but why on earth did the woman who didn't want Michael Myers to shove scissors into her throat allow them to have her character's legs chopped off in a truly laughable moment.

The zombies weren't that great and I'm not buying the rapid character development either. One minute they're all helpless, the next they are engaging in hand to hand combat and firing guns like no one's business.

The characters all have god awful names and they kept allowing themselves to be eaten for the slightest thing...I have a scar on my face leave me to die...My leg was shot 20 minutes ago I might as well play the hero and allow myself to be eaten so that you can get to the basement. It was ludicrous!!

Jurgen Prochnow and Clint Howard ham it up so bad that you cringe, and the same scenes were inserted countless times to beef up the running time, and what was with the game footage? It might have worked for the openeing sequence and even for transitions but not in the middle of fight sequences.

And the much hyped 12 minute fight sequence might have been good, but there was no need to do the 360 bullet time thing for every one of the main characters one after the other.

I have never ever laughed out loud at a horror movie, but I swear to you that I almost wet my pants from laughing so hard.

Uwe Boll may have been at the reigns, but film is a collaborative process, and he alone cannot be faulted. To be fair he knows that the script was awful but he did a competent job. The fact that this opened wide and made enough of a profit to warrant a sequel meant that it was successful, and you can't fault someone for getting a job done however bad the end product might be. I know all about the ins and outs of the arguments and the backlash surrounding this film but I think it's rude to post news stories saying that he is stupid and that his films will all suck. I doubt that the excellent cast assembled for BloodRayne and even Alone in the Dark would have jumped on board if the scripts were sucktacular..perhaps we should give him a chance before belittling him.

Blood and Guts: Comments


Not Registered?
Sign up for FREE >>

There are currently no comments.
Why not have your say!?

Don't fall behind, make sure you get help
writing college papers fast.


Get Out Movie Review

Get Out

Cellar Dweller Movie Review

Cellar Dweller

Pyewacket Movie Review


Quiet Place, A Movie Review

Quiet Place, A

Blair Witch Movie Review

Blair Witch

Dont Breathe Movie Review

Dont Breathe

All Through The House Movie Review

All Through The House

Ghoulies Movie Review


Night of Fear Movie Review

Night of Fear

Happy Death Day Movie Review

Happy Death Day

The Ritual Movie Review

The Ritual

Mercy Christmas Movie Review

Mercy Christmas

The Unraveling Movie Review

The Unraveling

The Witch Movie Review

The Witch

The Other Side of the Door Movie Review

The Other Side of the Door


WIN Sci-Fi Thriller OCCUPATION on Blu-ray Hideo Nakata’s Classic RING Giveaway
Now you can Watch your favorite Horror Movies using the Official ShowBox App


An Interview with Doug Hawley
Doug Hawley