The Horror Asylum

Sign Up   Forgot Password? 
11,710 horror articles & features | 6,992 horror movies | 1,590 horror reviews | 1,683 giveaways hosted | 228 delicious interviews Established in 2001  
The Horror Asylum
  Horror News   Reviews   Giveaways   Interviews
Movies | TV | DVDs | Books | Games Movies | DVD | Books | Games Just Added | Ending Soon Just Added | Archives
Home About Enquiries Submissions Advertising Premium Feeds Cookies


Prepare Yourself for an 'Alien Death F#ck' TRINITY Coming on Christmas to VOD and Digital Download VIDI SPACE Announces First Annual Film Festival for Independent Filmmakers The End of the Halloween Movies?
The American Horror Story Guide to 80's Slasher Classics Marvel To Enter The Horror Movie Business? Robin Hood Film Review Jeschke Reveals New Horror Short 'It Happened on Orchard Street'

Nightmare on Elm Street Part 2: Freddy's Revenge, A
Buy from Buy from

Nightmare on Elm Street Part 2: Freddy's Revenge, A (1985)

movie | Movie Details
Images, Posters, News
| Comments
Have your say

Plot Summary:
"It's been five years since Nancy Thompson waged her last battle with Freddy Krueger in that sinister house on Elm Street. Jesse Walsh, the son of a new family in town, starts having bad dreams - he soon realises there is some evil in the house."

Review by
Ryan McDonald
Follow me:
Review Date: 21 February 2017 My Rating: out of 5


Mark Patton plays high-schooler Jesse, whose family have just moved into Nancy Thompson’s old house on Elm Street. Jesse begins having nightmare visions about Freddy Krueger (Robert Englund). Freddy wants Jesse to do his bidding, and slowly begins to invade the boy’s body. Killing and homoeroticism ensue.

I know no one knew what the series would become, but this sequel from director Jack Sholder and screenwriter David Chaskin really does stand out like a sore thumb for a whole bunch of reasons. For starters, it has Freddy Krueger using a young man as kind of a vessel, which isn’t the worst idea in theory, I suppose. However, even if you can get past that, someone decided to take a pretty different creative direction for this one, and…it’s awkward.

This one’s all about puberty and homosexuality. That’s not an inherently awful idea for a horror film, really. Here it’s appallingly done, awkward, and doesn’t fit in with the rest of the series. I get that it’s only the second film, but still…this is weird and not in an especially compelling way. Poor Mark Patton is completely out of his depth, and no one here is taking the themes remotely seriously. Just look at the dialogue. Lines like ‘Assume the position!’ from Patton’s S&M-loving and presumably gay coach (Marshall Bell) who is surely not talking about push-ups, Freddy saying ‘I need you Jesse’, etc. It’s beyond corny and in no way sincere, despite Patton himself apparently being gay. The whole gay/bisexual angle might’ve had half a chance if Patton wasn’t such an awful actor and it weren’t so insincere and heavy-handed. If you’re still in doubt that this is one sexually fluid film, co-star Robert Rusler’s character has a Limahl poster on his wall. C’mon. Add to that Patton’s cries of ‘He’s inside me and he wants to take me again!’. Subtle, guys. Real subtle. As far as I’m concerned, no serious examination of gay/teen sexuality themes would also involve a scene with a demonic budgie attack.

Mark Patton is one of the worst actors to ever headline a horror film. I’m glad he eventually found another profession that he’s presumably a lot better at, because he’s just not an actor. At all. His complete lack of charisma and complete inability to convincingly emote help torpedo an already fast sinking ship. Better is veteran character actor Marshall Bell as the S&M-loving gym teacher. Very few actors play hardened a-holes better than Bell, but boy does he face some very big obstacles here. The role is somehow ambiguous without being remotely subtle, and is very weird and somewhat homophobic. Kim Myers (as the girl who clearly likes Jesse more than he likes her) is better than Patton but pretty dull if you ask me. Clu Gulager is usually good value, but he’s seemingly in a foul mood in this. I guess he only read the script before the cameras rolled. The characters frankly suck here. The next film, the best in the series, would give us a far more enjoyable bunch of characters than these dullards.

In a positive sense, the only memorable thing about the film is the opening bus trip nightmare, with Robert Englund sans makeup playing the bus driver before Freddy takes over. A later chest-bursting scene is kinda memorable, but what in the hell is it doing in an “Elm Street” film? It doesn’t seem to fit. Meanwhile, there were some really dumb death scenes in parts 5 & 6, but one death scene here involving gym equipment is for me, by far the dumbest in the entire series. It’s a shame that the film takes the body-invasion approach, because when we do see Freddy, he’s seen mostly in shadow and barely talks, both of which are effective. But the body-invasion is stupid (and no one gets killed in a nightmare!), and Patton’s ineptitude further sinks it.

Thematically ambitious and audacious, but not in the correct proportion to the talent involved. Agonisingly slow, clichéd, wrong-headed, insincerely written, and mostly appallingly acted. Every bad thing you've heard about this film is true. It's not even entertainingly bad.

Reviewer: Phil Davies Brown @horrorasylum
Location:Scotland, UK
Review Date: 29 September 2005 My Rating: out of 5

Jack Sholder's sequel to the 1984 original is despised by many fans, but the ensuing twenty years have allowed time for reflection and I salute them for going in an entirely different direction.

This time Freddy possesses a male teenager named Jesse who has recently moved into the vacant Elm Street property, and sets about offing his peers in various grisly fashions. This seems quite adequate to me when you see the cast wardrobe.

This film is known to be one of the most homo-erotic horror movies ever to grace the silver screen thanks to Mark Patton's portrayal of Jesse (a name which only adds fuel to the fire of debate which insists that the writer intended the protagonist's struggle with his inner demon to be a metaphor for homosexuality).

The film is notable for its bus ride to hell, and slaughter party sequences, but it's ultimately a little to Freudian for the casual horror fan.

Robert Englund was kind of dark in this outing and the make-up was actually quite disgusting, as chunks of flesh appeared to be falling off.

The score by Christopher Young is a highlight, despite the fact that this is the only film that doesn't use a variation of Charles Bernstein's theme tune.

A little too gay for many horror fans liking, but Victor Salva fans will surely rejoice at the sequences involving teenaged boys writhing around in their tighty whiteys.

Don't fall behind, make sure you get help
writing college papers fast.


Get Out Movie Review

Get Out

Cellar Dweller Movie Review

Cellar Dweller

Pyewacket Movie Review


Quiet Place, A Movie Review

Quiet Place, A

Blair Witch Movie Review

Blair Witch

Dont Breathe Movie Review

Dont Breathe

All Through The House Movie Review

All Through The House

Ghoulies Movie Review


Night of Fear Movie Review

Night of Fear

Happy Death Day Movie Review

Happy Death Day

The Ritual Movie Review

The Ritual

Mercy Christmas Movie Review

Mercy Christmas

The Unraveling Movie Review

The Unraveling

The Witch Movie Review

The Witch

The Other Side of the Door Movie Review

The Other Side of the Door


Now you can Watch your favorite Horror Movies using the Official ShowBox App


An Interview with Doug Hawley
Doug Hawley